Commons:Deletion requests/Image:BrewsterSchoolhouse.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Proable copyvio via flickr wash. The flickr account this came from is being used by a user from the English wikipedia to reinsert copyvio images into articles. The same image was uploaded by another sock of the user directly onto the commons. BlueAzure 23:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Are there any confirmed copyvios from this account? Image:BrewsterSchoolhouseNR.JPG appears to be under active discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:BrewsterSchoolhouseNR.JPG. I see no clear proof it's a copyvio. 22:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, ultimately at most one of these should be kept, even if it's not a copyvio. Superm401 - Talk 22:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- The first image uploaded appears to have be a copyvio, most likely taken from this flickr user. This newer image seems acceptable - it is much clearer + is dated on the lower righthand corner. --RocketJohnson 18:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- The image has now been removed from the flickr account, this happened with other images from this flickr account (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PremiumPoint (1).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Image:NREntrySign.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Image:QueenCity.jpg).
- The first image uploaded appears to have be a copyvio, most likely taken from this flickr user. This newer image seems acceptable - it is much clearer + is dated on the lower righthand corner. --RocketJohnson 18:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, ultimately at most one of these should be kept, even if it's not a copyvio. Superm401 - Talk 22:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Superm401, their have been a number of confirmed copyvios from the flickr account. A number of the images are screenshot of the bird's eye view or satellite view from a mapping site, this one comes from here, this one from here, and this one from here. BlueAzure 20:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Given this evidence, I would be highly skeptical of the account and support deleting this image. Also, I believe the account should be added to Commons:Questionable Flickr images. Superm401 - Talk 04:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- The image can still be seen at the flickr account. It is likely this is the original source of the image from which earlier user/users obtained and copied it. -- unsigned message by User:61.9.184.186, whose only other edit here was to comment on a related proposed deletion
- Another deletion discussion for a schmaberton image was Commons:Deletion requests/Image:StJohnsWilmotNR.JPG. --Orlady 01:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- This image, along with rest of images in the account, has been removed again. BlueAzure 01:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Another deletion discussion for a schmaberton image was Commons:Deletion requests/Image:StJohnsWilmotNR.JPG. --Orlady 01:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- The image can still be seen at the flickr account. It is likely this is the original source of the image from which earlier user/users obtained and copied it. -- unsigned message by User:61.9.184.186, whose only other edit here was to comment on a related proposed deletion
- Delete. Given this evidence, I would be highly skeptical of the account and support deleting this image. Also, I believe the account should be added to Commons:Questionable Flickr images. Superm401 - Talk 04:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Superm401, their have been a number of confirmed copyvios from the flickr account. A number of the images are screenshot of the bird's eye view or satellite view from a mapping site, this one comes from here, this one from here, and this one from here. BlueAzure 20:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 10:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)